-6000x2639-2000x880.webp)
Table of Content
- The Hidden Cost of AI Interaction
- Environmental Footprint and Energy Consumption of AI
- How AI Is Challenging Europe’s Leadership in the Energy Revolution
- Are We Forgetting We’re Talking to Machines?
The Hidden Cost of AI Interaction
AI systems like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot process every word users type, including the automatic “please” and “thank you” slipped in out of habit. These polite extras may seem harmless, but they add data load that AI systems must process with every request. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that these polite tokens alone are responsible for tens of millions of dollars in annual energy costs!
Each word or word fragment requires computation. When scaled across millions of users and prompts every day, this additional processing leads to greater energy consumption.
This is also true for highly searched topics with high volumes of data on online platforms like europages. Imagine for example the number of searches for food products and the data added on by food suppliers...all processed by AI!
Environmental Footprint and Energy Consumption of AI
Did you know that a single AI-generated response can consume up to 0.14 kWh of electricity? It’s roughly the same as running 14 LED bulbs for an hour.
On its own, this may seem minor, but when multiplied by millions of prompts generated every day across various sectors, the total energy use becomes substantial.
In 2024, data centers that power AI systems were responsible for approximately 1.5% of global electricity consumption. This figure is expected to double by 2030 as AI adoption continues to grow. These facilities also account for around 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
For businesses using AI, long prompts mean more processing, which raises costs and makes it harder to meet ESG targets.
How AI Is Challenging Europe’s Leadership in the Energy Revolution
European businesses are rapidly integrating AI into daily workflows, from procurement to predictive maintenance.
This surge in adoption coincides with the EU’s ambition to lead the global clean energy transition. But small inefficiencies in how AI is used may undermine those efforts.
Verbose prompts, multiplied across teams and systems, add up. Not only do they increase computing needs, but they also contribute to higher emissions, a contradiction for companies aiming to meet Europe’s Green Deal objectives.
In sectors with usage-based pricing models, like AI subscriptions, hidden costs can quietly pile up. Meanwhile, environmental accountability is becoming non-negotiable. Businesses with strong ESG commitments must now factor AI-related energy consumption into their sustainability metrics.
Are We Forgetting We’re Talking to Machines?
There is an ongoing debate in the AI community. Some developers argue that polite language improves user experience and helps maintain a positive workplace tone. A Microsoft Copilot designer, for example, has encouraged natural and friendly phrasing.
However, AI does not require kindness. It requires clarity. Politeness does not affect performance accuracy, although it can influence the tone and style of responses. From a technical perspective, clear and specific prompts are more efficient and effective.
Prompt minimalism is becoming more common in commercial and technical environments. In high-volume settings, reducing the number of words in each prompt can lead to meaningful savings in both energy and cost.
Conclusion
The instinct to be polite is a natural part of human communication, and it's remarkable how often people automatically extend that courtesy to machines. But in professional contexts where AI is a tool rather than a person, clarity and efficiency should take priority over courtesy.
As AI becomes more integrated into business operations across Europe, the focus should shift from friendly phrasing to functional efficiency. In the context of AI, brevity is not impolite. It is responsible.